Error in DPARSF 4.1 for Rat Data

Submitted by mariambehboudi on Fri, 11/11/2016 - 10:21

Hi everyone

When I choose yes in DPARSF 4.1 for Rat Data, I face this error. What should I do now?

 

Error using subsindex
Function 'subsindex' is not defined for values of class 'matlab.ui.Figure'.
 
Error in y_spm_orthviews>specify_image (line 654)
while ~isempty(st{curfig}.vols{ii}), ii = ii + 1; end
 
Error in y_spm_orthviews (line 281)
        H = specify_image(varargin{1});
 
Error in DPABI_VIEW_DPABI_VIEW_OpeningFcn (line 108)
y_spm_orthviews('Image',UnderlayHeader);
 
Error in gui_mainfcn (line 220)
    feval(gui_State.gui_OpeningFcn, gui_hFigure, [], guidata(gui_hFigure), varargin{:});
 
Error in DPABI_VIEW (line 41)
    [varargout{1:nargout}] = gui_mainfcn(gui_State, varargin{:});
 
Error in w_Call_DPABI_VIEW (line 38)
    curfig=DPABI_VIEW;
 
Error in dpabi>pushbutton_DPARSFRat_Callback (line 175)
    uiwait(w_Call_DPABI_VIEW([],[],[],[],[],[TemplatePath,filesep,'SchwarzRatTemplates',filesep,'rat97t2w_96x96x30.v6.nii']));
    
Error in gui_mainfcn (line 95)
        feval(varargin{:});
 
Error in dpabi (line 42)
    gui_mainfcn(gui_State, varargin{:});
 
Error in @(hObject,eventdata)dpabi('pushbutton_DPARSFRat_Callback',hObject,eventdata,guidata(hObject))
 
 
Error while evaluating UIControl Callback
 
 
Best
Mariam

Forums:

bioengman

Fri, 11/11/2016 - 11:00






What matlab version are y uzing ? Do y have the last version of dpabi master and spm12

Get Outlook for Android

From: RFMRI.ORG <rfmri.org-bounces@rnet.co> on behalf of The R-fMRI Network <rfmri.org@gmail.com>

Sent: Friday, November 11, 2016 5:21:20 AM

To: rfmri.org@rnet.co

Subject: [RFMRI] Error in DPARSF 4.1 for Rat Data

 

mariambehboudi

Fri, 11/11/2016 - 12:23

I use MATLAB 2015a and SPM 12 and dpabi 4.1.

YAN Chao-Gan

Tue, 11/15/2016 - 23:46

Probably update SPM12 and dpabi again can solve that.

bioengman

Mon, 11/28/2016 - 15:35






Hi
Im running two sample T test between two group Control and Patient (FC Zmap), after correction with GRF ( voxel p<0.025, cluster p<0.1, two tailed). I got some correlation with my seed and Cingulum cortex in the control group ( that was my hypothesis), but
nothing in the other side with patient group.

then I run separate One sample t test for my FC Zmap for each group separately , after using GRF ( voxel p<0.01, cluster p<0.05, one tailed). I got some correlation with my seed in both group. with the control group with Cingulum cortex and with patient group
with Caudal_putamen ( that was my hypothesis)

1- My first question is the p value that i enter of GRF correction are Right ? is it a valid Test ?

2-Why  could not see the same effect for two sample T test in patient group

3- how can i interpret my one sample T test : can i say that there is a difference between the two group ?

Best wishes

Get Outlook for Android

From: RFMRI.ORG <rfmri.org-bounces@rnet.co> on behalf of The R-fMRI Network <rfmri.org@gmail.com>

Sent: Friday, November 11, 2016 5:21:20 AM

To: rfmri.org@rnet.co

Subject: [RFMRI] Error in DPARSF 4.1 for Rat Data

 

YAN Chao-Gan

Mon, 11/28/2016 - 23:28

1. Valid.

2. It's common you can not see symmetric differences.

3. Between group differences can not be inferred from one sample t tests.

bioengman

Tue, 12/06/2016 - 21:15






Hi

I have run 3 sessions separately, how can I  average all session together ?...my final file : FunImgRWSCF


Thank you




From: Marouane Nassim

Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 7:30:24 AM

To: The R-fMRI Network; rfmri.org@rnet.co

Subject: Re: [RFMRI] Error in DPARSF 4.1 for Rat Data

 

Hi

Im running two sample T test between two group Control and Patient (FC Zmap), after correction with GRF ( voxel p<0.025, cluster p<0.1, two tailed). I got some correlation with my seed and Cingulum cortex in the control group ( that was my hypothesis), but
nothing in the other side with patient group.

then I run separate One sample t test for my FC Zmap for each group separately , after using GRF ( voxel p<0.01, cluster p<0.05, one tailed). I got some correlation with my seed in both group. with the control group with Cingulum cortex and with patient group
with Caudal_putamen ( that was my hypothesis)

1- My first question is the p value that i enter of GRF correction are Right ? is it a valid Test ?

2-Why  could not see the same effect for two sample T test in patient group

3- how can i interpret my one sample T test : can i say that there is a difference between the two group ?

Best wishes

Get Outlook for Android

From: RFMRI.ORG <rfmri.org-bounces@rnet.co> on behalf of The R-fMRI Network <rfmri.org@gmail.com>

Sent: Friday, November 11, 2016 5:21:20 AM

To: rfmri.org@rnet.co

Subject: [RFMRI] Error in DPARSF 4.1 for Rat Data

 

flgarcia

Tue, 11/28/2017 - 18:59

Hi,

You can use the Image Calculator function (in the Utilities module), but it needs to be on the postprocessing output (and I think it needs to be the r-to-z transformed files, perhaps someone else can confirm this?). Also, it may be better to put coregistration and filtering before normalization and smoothing, and include slice-time correction (ARCFWS).

Best,

Felix